Correlation Between Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sequoia Financial Group and Australian Agricultural, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sequoia Financial with a short position of Australian Agricultural. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural.

Diversification Opportunities for Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural

-0.03
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sequoia and Australian is -0.03. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sequoia Financial Group and Australian Agricultural in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Australian Agricultural and Sequoia Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sequoia Financial Group are associated (or correlated) with Australian Agricultural. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Australian Agricultural has no effect on the direction of Sequoia Financial i.e., Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Sequoia Financial Group is expected to generate 2.5 times more return on investment than Australian Agricultural. However, Sequoia Financial is 2.5 times more volatile than Australian Agricultural. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Australian Agricultural is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  37.00  in Sequoia Financial Group on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4.00  from holding Sequoia Financial Group or generate 10.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sequoia Financial Group  vs.  Australian Agricultural

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sequoia Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sequoia Financial Group are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Sequoia Financial may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Australian Agricultural 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Australian Agricultural are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, Australian Agricultural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sequoia Financial and Australian Agricultural positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sequoia Financial position performs unexpectedly, Australian Agricultural can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Australian Agricultural will offset losses from the drop in Australian Agricultural's long position.
The idea behind Sequoia Financial Group and Australian Agricultural pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets