Correlation Between Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dws Emerging Markets and Columbia Seligman Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dws Emerging with a short position of Columbia Seligman. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman.

Diversification Opportunities for Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman

-0.17

Correlation Coefficient

Dws Emerging  Columbia Seligman

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dws and Columbia is -0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dws Emerging Markets and Columbia Seligman Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Seligman Global and Dws Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dws Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Seligman. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Seligman Global has no effect on the direction of Dws Emerging i.e., Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman

Assuming the 90 days horizon Dws Emerging Markets is expected to generate 0.22 times more return on investment than Columbia Seligman. However, Dws Emerging Markets is 4.45 times less risky than Columbia Seligman. It trades about 0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Seligman Global is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,837  in Dws Emerging Markets on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  67.00  from holding Dws Emerging Markets or generate 3.65% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Dws Emerging Markets  vs.  Columbia Seligman Global

Dws Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dws Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Dws Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Seligman Global

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Seligman Global are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Seligman is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dws Emerging and Columbia Seligman positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dws Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Seligman can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Seligman will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Seligman's long position.

The idea behind Dws Emerging Markets and Columbia Seligman Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.