Correlation Between Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scotch Creek Ventures and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scotch Creek with a short position of REDFLEX HOLDINGS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS.

Diversification Opportunities for Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scotch and REDFLEX is 0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scotch Creek Ventures and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD and Scotch Creek is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scotch Creek Ventures are associated (or correlated) with REDFLEX HOLDINGS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD has no effect on the direction of Scotch Creek i.e., Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scotch Creek Ventures is expected to under-perform the REDFLEX HOLDINGS. But the pink sheet apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Scotch Creek Ventures is 1.58 times less risky than REDFLEX HOLDINGS. The pink sheet trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.50  in REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.71) from holding REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD or give up 20.29% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scotch Creek Ventures  vs.  REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scotch Creek Ventures 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Scotch Creek Ventures has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, REDFLEX HOLDINGS reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scotch Creek and REDFLEX HOLDINGS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scotch Creek position performs unexpectedly, REDFLEX HOLDINGS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in REDFLEX HOLDINGS will offset losses from the drop in REDFLEX HOLDINGS's long position.
The idea behind Scotch Creek Ventures and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years