Correlation Between SPORTING and US FOODS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SPORTING and US FOODS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SPORTING and US FOODS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SPORTING and US FOODS HOLDING, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SPORTING and US FOODS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SPORTING with a short position of US FOODS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SPORTING and US FOODS.

Diversification Opportunities for SPORTING and US FOODS

0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between SPORTING and UFH is 0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SPORTING and US FOODS HOLDING in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on US FOODS HOLDING and SPORTING is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SPORTING are associated (or correlated) with US FOODS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of US FOODS HOLDING has no effect on the direction of SPORTING i.e., SPORTING and US FOODS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between SPORTING and US FOODS

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon SPORTING is expected to under-perform the US FOODS. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, SPORTING is 1.21 times less risky than US FOODS. The stock trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The US FOODS HOLDING is currently generating about -0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,650  in US FOODS HOLDING on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (200.00) from holding US FOODS HOLDING or give up 3.01% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

SPORTING  vs.  US FOODS HOLDING

 Performance 
       Timeline  
SPORTING 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in SPORTING are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, SPORTING is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
US FOODS HOLDING 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in US FOODS HOLDING are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical indicators, US FOODS exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

SPORTING and US FOODS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with SPORTING and US FOODS

The main advantage of trading using opposite SPORTING and US FOODS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SPORTING position performs unexpectedly, US FOODS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in US FOODS will offset losses from the drop in US FOODS's long position.
The idea behind SPORTING and US FOODS HOLDING pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes