Correlation Between State Bank and Global Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both State Bank and Global Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining State Bank and Global Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between State Bank of and Global Health Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on State Bank and Global Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in State Bank with a short position of Global Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of State Bank and Global Health.

Diversification Opportunities for State Bank and Global Health

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between State and Global is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding State Bank of and Global Health Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Health Limited and State Bank is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on State Bank of are associated (or correlated) with Global Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Health Limited has no effect on the direction of State Bank i.e., State Bank and Global Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between State Bank and Global Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon State Bank is expected to generate 2.42 times less return on investment than Global Health. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, State Bank of is 1.29 times less risky than Global Health. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Global Health Limited is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  47,070  in Global Health Limited on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  62,580  from holding Global Health Limited or generate 132.95% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

State Bank of  vs.  Global Health Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
State Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in State Bank of are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, State Bank is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Global Health Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Health Limited are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Global Health is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

State Bank and Global Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with State Bank and Global Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite State Bank and Global Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if State Bank position performs unexpectedly, Global Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Health will offset losses from the drop in Global Health's long position.
The idea behind State Bank of and Global Health Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm