Correlation Between Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Conservative Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Balanced with a short position of Conservative Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced

0.96

Correlation Coefficient

Aggressive Balanced  Conservative Balanced

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Conservative is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Conservative Balanced Allocati in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Conservative Balanced and Aggressive Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Balanced Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Conservative Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Conservative Balanced has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Balanced i.e., Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced

Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Balanced Allocation is expected to generate about the same return on investment as Conservative Balanced Allocation. However, Aggressive Balanced is 1.3 times more volatile than Conservative Balanced Allocation. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Conservative Balanced Allocation is currently producing about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,137  in Conservative Balanced Allocation on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (21.00) from holding Conservative Balanced Allocation or give up 1.85% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Aggressive Balanced Allocation  vs.  Conservative Balanced Allocati

Aggressive Balanced

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Aggressive Balanced Allocation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Aggressive Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Conservative Balanced

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Conservative Balanced Allocation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Conservative Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Conservative Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Conservative Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Conservative Balanced's long position.

The idea behind Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Conservative Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.