Correlation Between Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Seagate Technology Holdings and Iron Mountain Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Seagate Technology with a short position of Iron Mountain. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain.

Diversification Opportunities for Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain

0.48

Correlation Coefficient

Seagate Technology  Iron Mountain

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Seagate and Iron is 0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Seagate Technology Holdings and Iron Mountain Incorporated in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Iron Mountain and Seagate Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Seagate Technology Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Iron Mountain. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Iron Mountain has no effect on the direction of Seagate Technology i.e., Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Seagate Technology is expected to generate 1.53 times less return on investment than Iron Mountain. In addition to that, Seagate Technology is 1.12 times more volatile than Iron Mountain Incorporated. It trades about 0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Iron Mountain Incorporated is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  25,473  in Iron Mountain Incorporated on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  37,032  from holding Iron Mountain Incorporated or generate 145.38% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	67.14%
Values	Daily Returns

Seagate Technology Holdings  vs.  Iron Mountain Incorporated

Seagate Technology

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Seagate Technology Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Seagate Technology is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Iron Mountain

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Iron Mountain Incorporated has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Iron Mountain is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain

The main advantage of trading using opposite Seagate Technology and Iron Mountain positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Seagate Technology position performs unexpectedly, Iron Mountain can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Iron Mountain will offset losses from the drop in Iron Mountain's long position.

The idea behind Seagate Technology Holdings and Iron Mountain Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.