Correlation Between Energy Services and Commodities Strategy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energy Services and Commodities Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energy Services and Commodities Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energy Services Fund and Commodities Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energy Services and Commodities Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energy Services with a short position of Commodities Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energy Services and Commodities Strategy.

Diversification Opportunities for Energy Services and Commodities Strategy

0.22

Correlation Coefficient

Energy Services  Commodities Strategy

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energy and Commodities is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Services Fund and Commodities Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Commodities Strategy and Energy Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energy Services Fund are associated (or correlated) with Commodities Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Commodities Strategy has no effect on the direction of Energy Services i.e., Energy Services and Commodities Strategy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energy Services and Commodities Strategy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Energy Services Fund is expected to under-perform the Commodities Strategy. In addition to that, Energy Services is 2.36 times more volatile than Commodities Strategy Fund. It trades about -0.24 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Commodities Strategy Fund is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,625  in Commodities Strategy Fund on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2.00) from holding Commodities Strategy Fund or give up 0.12% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Energy Services Fund  vs.  Commodities Strategy Fund

Energy Services

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Energy Services Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's forward indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Commodities Strategy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Commodities Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking indicators, Commodities Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Energy Services and Commodities Strategy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energy Services and Commodities Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energy Services position performs unexpectedly, Commodities Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Commodities Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Commodities Strategy's long position.

The idea behind Energy Services Fund and Commodities Strategy Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.