Correlation Between Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commodities Strategy Fund and Investment Grade Porate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commodities Strategy with a short position of Investment Grade. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade.

Diversification Opportunities for Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade

-0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Commodities and Investment is -0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commodities Strategy Fund and Investment Grade Porate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Investment Grade Porate and Commodities Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commodities Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Investment Grade. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Investment Grade Porate has no effect on the direction of Commodities Strategy i.e., Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade

Assuming the 90 days horizon Commodities Strategy Fund is expected to generate 2.24 times more return on investment than Investment Grade. However, Commodities Strategy is 2.24 times more volatile than Investment Grade Porate. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Investment Grade Porate is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  15,000  in Commodities Strategy Fund on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  429.00  from holding Commodities Strategy Fund or generate 2.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Commodities Strategy Fund  vs.  Investment Grade Porate

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Commodities Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Commodities Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, Commodities Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Investment Grade Porate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Investment Grade Porate are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Investment Grade is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade

The main advantage of trading using opposite Commodities Strategy and Investment Grade positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commodities Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Investment Grade can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Investment Grade will offset losses from the drop in Investment Grade's long position.
The idea behind Commodities Strategy Fund and Investment Grade Porate pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities