Correlation Between Commodities Strategy and Great West

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commodities Strategy and Great West at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commodities Strategy and Great West into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commodities Strategy Fund and Great West Loomis Sayles, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commodities Strategy and Great West and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commodities Strategy with a short position of Great West. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commodities Strategy and Great West.

Diversification Opportunities for Commodities Strategy and Great West

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Commodities and Great is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commodities Strategy Fund and Great West Loomis Sayles in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Great West Loomis and Commodities Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commodities Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Great West. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Great West Loomis has no effect on the direction of Commodities Strategy i.e., Commodities Strategy and Great West go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Commodities Strategy and Great West

Assuming the 90 days horizon Commodities Strategy is expected to generate 2.6 times less return on investment than Great West. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Commodities Strategy Fund is 1.06 times less risky than Great West. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Great West Loomis Sayles is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,109  in Great West Loomis Sayles on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  782.00  from holding Great West Loomis Sayles or generate 25.15% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Commodities Strategy Fund  vs.  Great West Loomis Sayles

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Commodities Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Commodities Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, Commodities Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Great West Loomis 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Great West Loomis Sayles are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Great West is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Commodities Strategy and Great West Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Commodities Strategy and Great West

The main advantage of trading using opposite Commodities Strategy and Great West positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commodities Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Great West can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Great West will offset losses from the drop in Great West's long position.
The idea behind Commodities Strategy Fund and Great West Loomis Sayles pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal