Correlation Between Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commodities Strategy Fund and Goldman Sachs Clean, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commodities Strategy with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs

0.12
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Commodities and Goldman is 0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commodities Strategy Fund and Goldman Sachs Clean in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Clean and Commodities Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commodities Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Clean has no effect on the direction of Commodities Strategy i.e., Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Commodities Strategy Fund is expected to generate 1.0 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Commodities Strategy Fund is 1.0 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Clean is currently generating about -0.39 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,936  in Commodities Strategy Fund on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2.00) from holding Commodities Strategy Fund or give up 0.07% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Commodities Strategy Fund  vs.  Goldman Sachs Clean

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Commodities Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Commodities Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, Commodities Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Clean 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Clean has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Commodities Strategy and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commodities Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Commodities Strategy Fund and Goldman Sachs Clean pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital