Correlation Between Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Managed Futures and Upright Assets Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Managed with a short position of Upright Assets. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Upright is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Managed Futures and Upright Assets Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Upright Assets Allocation and Guggenheim Managed is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Managed Futures are associated (or correlated) with Upright Assets. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Upright Assets Allocation has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Managed i.e., Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim Managed Futures is expected to under-perform the Upright Assets. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Guggenheim Managed Futures is 1.87 times less risky than Upright Assets. The mutual fund trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Upright Assets Allocation is currently generating about -0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,435  in Upright Assets Allocation on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (35.00) from holding Upright Assets Allocation or give up 2.44% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Managed Futures  vs.  Upright Assets Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Managed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Guggenheim Managed Futures has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Guggenheim Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Upright Assets Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Upright Assets Allocation are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Upright Assets is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Managed and Upright Assets positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Managed position performs unexpectedly, Upright Assets can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Upright Assets will offset losses from the drop in Upright Assets' long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Managed Futures and Upright Assets Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk