Correlation Between Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Managed Futures and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Managed with a short position of Counterpoint Tactical. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical

-0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Counterpoint is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Managed Futures and Counterpoint Tactical Municipa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Counterpoint Tactical and Guggenheim Managed is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Managed Futures are associated (or correlated) with Counterpoint Tactical. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Counterpoint Tactical has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Managed i.e., Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim Managed Futures is expected to generate 1.56 times more return on investment than Counterpoint Tactical. However, Guggenheim Managed is 1.56 times more volatile than Counterpoint Tactical Municipal. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Counterpoint Tactical Municipal is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,973  in Guggenheim Managed Futures on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  50.00  from holding Guggenheim Managed Futures or generate 2.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Managed Futures  vs.  Counterpoint Tactical Municipa

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Managed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Managed Futures are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Guggenheim Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Counterpoint Tactical 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Counterpoint Tactical Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Counterpoint Tactical is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Managed and Counterpoint Tactical positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Managed position performs unexpectedly, Counterpoint Tactical can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Counterpoint Tactical will offset losses from the drop in Counterpoint Tactical's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Managed Futures and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance