Correlation Between Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Managed Futures and Fidelity Sai Minimum, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Managed with a short position of Fidelity Sai. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai

-0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Fidelity is -0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Managed Futures and Fidelity Sai Minimum in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Sai Minimum and Guggenheim Managed is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Managed Futures are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Sai. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Sai Minimum has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Managed i.e., Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim Managed Futures is expected to under-perform the Fidelity Sai. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Guggenheim Managed Futures is 1.03 times less risky than Fidelity Sai. The mutual fund trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Fidelity Sai Minimum is currently generating about -0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,168  in Fidelity Sai Minimum on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (7.00) from holding Fidelity Sai Minimum or give up 0.32% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Managed Futures  vs.  Fidelity Sai Minimum

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Managed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Managed Futures are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Guggenheim Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fidelity Sai Minimum 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Fidelity Sai Minimum has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Fidelity Sai is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Managed and Fidelity Sai positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Managed position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Sai can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Sai will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Sai's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Managed Futures and Fidelity Sai Minimum pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk