Correlation Between Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Banking Fund Class and Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Banking Fund with a short position of Monthly Rebalance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance.

Diversification Opportunities for Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance

0.83

Correlation Coefficient

Banking Fund  Monthly Rebalance

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Banking and Monthly is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Banking Fund Class and Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Monthly Rebalance and Banking Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Banking Fund Class are associated (or correlated) with Monthly Rebalance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Monthly Rebalance has no effect on the direction of Banking Fund i.e., Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance

Assuming the 90 days horizon Banking Fund is expected to generate 1.29 times less return on investment than Monthly Rebalance. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Banking Fund Class is 1.1 times less risky than Monthly Rebalance. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  54,443  in Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 on September 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  13,225  from holding Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 or generate 24.29% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Banking Fund Class  vs.  Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100

Banking Fund Class

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Banking Fund Class are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking signals, Banking Fund showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Monthly Rebalance

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Monthly Rebalance showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Banking Fund and Monthly Rebalance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Banking Fund position performs unexpectedly, Monthly Rebalance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monthly Rebalance will offset losses from the drop in Monthly Rebalance's long position.

The idea behind Banking Fund Class and Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.