Correlation Between Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Redwood Systematic Macro and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Redwood Systematic with a short position of LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor.
Diversification Opportunities for Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor
0.74 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Redwood and LeaderSharesTM is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Redwood Systematic Macro and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Cor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Redwood Systematic Macro are associated (or correlated) with LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor has no effect on the direction of Redwood Systematic i.e., Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor
Assuming the 90 days horizon Redwood Systematic Macro is expected to under-perform the LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Redwood Systematic Macro is 1.12 times less risky than LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor. The mutual fund trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 3,087 in LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,012 from holding LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core or generate 32.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 99.8% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Redwood Systematic Macro vs. LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Cor
Performance |
Timeline |
Redwood Systematic Macro |
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor |
Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor
The main advantage of trading using opposite Redwood Systematic and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Redwood Systematic position performs unexpectedly, LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor will offset losses from the drop in LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor's long position.Redwood Systematic vs. Mid Cap Growth | Redwood Systematic vs. Needham Aggressive Growth | Redwood Systematic vs. Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth | Redwood Systematic vs. The Hartford Growth |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.
Other Complementary Tools
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data |