Correlation Between Red Robin and Dine Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Red Robin and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Red Robin and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Red Robin Gourmet and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Red Robin and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Red Robin with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Red Robin and Dine Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Red Robin and Dine Brands

-0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Red and Dine is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Red Robin Gourmet and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and Red Robin is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Red Robin Gourmet are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of Red Robin i.e., Red Robin and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Red Robin and Dine Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Red Robin Gourmet is expected to generate 1.88 times more return on investment than Dine Brands. However, Red Robin is 1.88 times more volatile than Dine Brands Global. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dine Brands Global is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  559.00  in Red Robin Gourmet on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  32.00  from holding Red Robin Gourmet or generate 5.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Red Robin Gourmet  vs.  Dine Brands Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Red Robin Gourmet 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Red Robin Gourmet are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, Red Robin sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile forward indicators, Dine Brands may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Red Robin and Dine Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Red Robin and Dine Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Red Robin and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Red Robin position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.
The idea behind Red Robin Gourmet and Dine Brands Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.