Correlation Between Regions Financial and Scientific Games

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Regions Financial and Scientific Games at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Regions Financial and Scientific Games into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Regions Financial and Scientific Games, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Regions Financial and Scientific Games and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Regions Financial with a short position of Scientific Games. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Regions Financial and Scientific Games.

Diversification Opportunities for Regions Financial and Scientific Games

0.69

Correlation Coefficient

Regions Financial  Scientific Games

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Regions and Scientific is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Regions Financial and Scientific Games in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scientific Games and Regions Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Regions Financial are associated (or correlated) with Scientific Games. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scientific Games has no effect on the direction of Regions Financial i.e., Regions Financial and Scientific Games go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Regions Financial and Scientific Games

Assuming the 90 days horizon Regions Financial is expected to generate 1.05 times more return on investment than Scientific Games. However, Regions Financial is 1.05 times more volatile than Scientific Games. It trades about -0.34 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Scientific Games is currently generating about -0.37 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,500  in Regions Financial on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (240.00) from holding Regions Financial or give up 9.6% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Regions Financial  vs.  Scientific Games

Regions Financial

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Regions Financial are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Regions Financial may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Regions Financial and Scientific Games

The main advantage of trading using opposite Regions Financial and Scientific Games positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Regions Financial position performs unexpectedly, Scientific Games can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will offset losses from the drop in Scientific Games' long position.

The idea behind Regions Financial and Scientific Games pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.