Correlation Between Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Rocky Mountain Chocolate and Bridgford Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Rocky Mountain with a short position of Bridgford Foods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods.

Diversification Opportunities for Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Rocky and Bridgford is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Rocky Mountain Chocolate and Bridgford Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bridgford Foods and Rocky Mountain is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Rocky Mountain Chocolate are associated (or correlated) with Bridgford Foods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bridgford Foods has no effect on the direction of Rocky Mountain i.e., Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Rocky Mountain Chocolate is expected to under-perform the Bridgford Foods. In addition to that, Rocky Mountain is 2.72 times more volatile than Bridgford Foods. It trades about -0.23 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Bridgford Foods is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,056  in Bridgford Foods on December 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (59.00) from holding Bridgford Foods or give up 5.59% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Rocky Mountain Chocolate  vs.  Bridgford Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Rocky Mountain Chocolate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Rocky Mountain Chocolate has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
Bridgford Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bridgford Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound forward indicators, Bridgford Foods is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods

The main advantage of trading using opposite Rocky Mountain and Bridgford Foods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Rocky Mountain position performs unexpectedly, Bridgford Foods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bridgford Foods will offset losses from the drop in Bridgford Foods' long position.
The idea behind Rocky Mountain Chocolate and Bridgford Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges