Correlation Between Red Hill and Mount Gibson

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Red Hill and Mount Gibson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Red Hill and Mount Gibson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Red Hill Iron and Mount Gibson Iron, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Red Hill and Mount Gibson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Red Hill with a short position of Mount Gibson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Red Hill and Mount Gibson.

Diversification Opportunities for Red Hill and Mount Gibson

0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Red and Mount is 0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Red Hill Iron and Mount Gibson Iron in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mount Gibson Iron and Red Hill is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Red Hill Iron are associated (or correlated) with Mount Gibson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mount Gibson Iron has no effect on the direction of Red Hill i.e., Red Hill and Mount Gibson go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Red Hill and Mount Gibson

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Red Hill Iron is expected to under-perform the Mount Gibson. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Red Hill Iron is 1.47 times less risky than Mount Gibson. The stock trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Mount Gibson Iron is currently generating about -0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  32.00  in Mount Gibson Iron on December 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2.00) from holding Mount Gibson Iron or give up 6.25% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Red Hill Iron  vs.  Mount Gibson Iron

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Red Hill Iron 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Red Hill Iron has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Mount Gibson Iron 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Mount Gibson Iron has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Mount Gibson is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Red Hill and Mount Gibson Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Red Hill and Mount Gibson

The main advantage of trading using opposite Red Hill and Mount Gibson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Red Hill position performs unexpectedly, Mount Gibson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mount Gibson will offset losses from the drop in Mount Gibson's long position.
The idea behind Red Hill Iron and Mount Gibson Iron pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites