Correlation Between Red Hill and Mount Gibson

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Red Hill and Mount Gibson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Red Hill and Mount Gibson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Red Hill Iron and Mount Gibson Iron, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Red Hill and Mount Gibson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Red Hill with a short position of Mount Gibson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Red Hill and Mount Gibson.

Diversification Opportunities for Red Hill and Mount Gibson

-0.26

Correlation Coefficient

Red Hill  Mount Gibson

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Red and Mount is -0.26. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Red Hill Iron and Mount Gibson Iron in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mount Gibson Iron and Red Hill is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Red Hill Iron are associated (or correlated) with Mount Gibson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mount Gibson Iron has no effect on the direction of Red Hill i.e., Red Hill and Mount Gibson go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Red Hill and Mount Gibson

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Red Hill Iron is expected to under-perform the Mount Gibson. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Red Hill Iron is 1.54 times less risky than Mount Gibson. The stock trades about -0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Mount Gibson Iron is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  31.00  in Mount Gibson Iron on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.00  from holding Mount Gibson Iron or generate 6.45% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.41%
Values	Daily Returns

Red Hill Iron  vs.  Mount Gibson Iron

Red Hill Iron

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Red Hill Iron has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Mount Gibson Iron

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mount Gibson Iron are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Mount Gibson may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Pair Trading with Red Hill and Mount Gibson

The main advantage of trading using opposite Red Hill and Mount Gibson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Red Hill position performs unexpectedly, Mount Gibson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mount Gibson will offset losses from the drop in Mount Gibson's long position.

The idea behind Red Hill Iron and Mount Gibson Iron pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.