Correlation Between Reading International and Madison Square

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Reading International and Madison Square at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Reading International and Madison Square into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Reading International and Madison Square Garden, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Reading International and Madison Square and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Reading International with a short position of Madison Square. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Reading International and Madison Square.

Diversification Opportunities for Reading International and Madison Square

0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Reading and Madison is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Reading International and Madison Square Garden in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Madison Square Garden and Reading International is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Reading International are associated (or correlated) with Madison Square. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Madison Square Garden has no effect on the direction of Reading International i.e., Reading International and Madison Square go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Reading International and Madison Square

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Reading International is expected to generate 3.21 times more return on investment than Madison Square. However, Reading International is 3.21 times more volatile than Madison Square Garden. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Madison Square Garden is currently generating about -0.21 per unit of risk. If you would invest  128.00  in Reading International on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  6.00  from holding Reading International or generate 4.69% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Reading International  vs.  Madison Square Garden

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Reading International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Reading International are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak fundamental indicators, Reading International may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.
Madison Square Garden 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Madison Square Garden has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Reading International and Madison Square Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Reading International and Madison Square

The main advantage of trading using opposite Reading International and Madison Square positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Reading International position performs unexpectedly, Madison Square can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Madison Square will offset losses from the drop in Madison Square's long position.
The idea behind Reading International and Madison Square Garden pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings