Correlation Between Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Rogers Communications with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf

0.01

Correlation Coefficient

Rogers Communications  Maple Leaf

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Rogers and Maple is 0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Rogers Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Rogers Communications are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Rogers Communications i.e., Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Rogers Communications is expected to under-perform the Maple Leaf. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Rogers Communications is 1.16 times less risky than Maple Leaf. The stock trades about -0.42 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about -0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,241  in Maple Leaf Foods on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (190.00) from holding Maple Leaf Foods or give up 8.48% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Rogers Communications  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

Rogers Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Rogers Communications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Maple Leaf Foods

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Maple Leaf Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Rogers Communications position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.

The idea behind Rogers Communications and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.