Correlation Between RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between RBC Bearings Incorporated and Software Acquisition Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in RBC Bearings with a short position of Software Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition.

Diversification Opportunities for RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between RBC and Software is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding RBC Bearings Incorporated and Software Acquisition Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Software Acquisition and RBC Bearings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on RBC Bearings Incorporated are associated (or correlated) with Software Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Software Acquisition has no effect on the direction of RBC Bearings i.e., RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition

Considering the 90-day investment horizon RBC Bearings is expected to generate 35.3 times less return on investment than Software Acquisition. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, RBC Bearings Incorporated is 17.44 times less risky than Software Acquisition. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Software Acquisition Group is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1.00  in Software Acquisition Group on December 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.44  from holding Software Acquisition Group or generate 44.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy79.66%
ValuesDaily Returns

RBC Bearings Incorporated  vs.  Software Acquisition Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
RBC Bearings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in RBC Bearings Incorporated are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental drivers, RBC Bearings may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.
Software Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Software Acquisition Group are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Software Acquisition showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition

The main advantage of trading using opposite RBC Bearings and Software Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if RBC Bearings position performs unexpectedly, Software Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Software Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Software Acquisition's long position.
The idea behind RBC Bearings Incorporated and Software Acquisition Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance