Correlation Between Growth Strategy and Russell Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Growth Strategy and Russell Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Growth Strategy and Russell Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Growth Strategy Fund and Russell Investment Tax Managed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Growth Strategy and Russell Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Growth Strategy with a short position of Russell Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Growth Strategy and Russell Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Growth Strategy and Russell Investment

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Growth and Russell is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Growth Strategy Fund and Russell Investment Tax Managed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Russell Investment Tax and Growth Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Growth Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Russell Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Russell Investment Tax has no effect on the direction of Growth Strategy i.e., Growth Strategy and Russell Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Growth Strategy and Russell Investment

Assuming the 90 days horizon Growth Strategy Fund is expected to under-perform the Russell Investment. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Growth Strategy Fund is 1.07 times less risky than Russell Investment. The mutual fund trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Russell Investment Tax Managed is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,205  in Russell Investment Tax Managed on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  14.00  from holding Russell Investment Tax Managed or generate 1.16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Growth Strategy Fund  vs.  Russell Investment Tax Managed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Growth Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Growth Strategy Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Growth Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Russell Investment Tax 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Russell Investment Tax Managed are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Russell Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Growth Strategy and Russell Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Growth Strategy and Russell Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Growth Strategy and Russell Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Growth Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Russell Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Russell Investment will offset losses from the drop in Russell Investment's long position.
The idea behind Growth Strategy Fund and Russell Investment Tax Managed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format