Correlation Between Retail Estates and US FOODS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Retail Estates and US FOODS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Retail Estates and US FOODS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Retail Estates NV and US FOODS HOLDING, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Retail Estates and US FOODS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Retail Estates with a short position of US FOODS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Retail Estates and US FOODS.

Diversification Opportunities for Retail Estates and US FOODS

-0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Retail and UFH is -0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Retail Estates NV and US FOODS HOLDING in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on US FOODS HOLDING and Retail Estates is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Retail Estates NV are associated (or correlated) with US FOODS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of US FOODS HOLDING has no effect on the direction of Retail Estates i.e., Retail Estates and US FOODS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Retail Estates and US FOODS

Assuming the 90 days horizon Retail Estates is expected to generate 4.05 times less return on investment than US FOODS. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Retail Estates NV is 1.16 times less risky than US FOODS. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. US FOODS HOLDING is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,420  in US FOODS HOLDING on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,180  from holding US FOODS HOLDING or generate 92.98% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Retail Estates NV  vs.  US FOODS HOLDING

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Retail Estates NV 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Retail Estates NV has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.
US FOODS HOLDING 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in US FOODS HOLDING are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather fragile technical indicators, US FOODS exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Retail Estates and US FOODS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Retail Estates and US FOODS

The main advantage of trading using opposite Retail Estates and US FOODS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Retail Estates position performs unexpectedly, US FOODS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in US FOODS will offset losses from the drop in US FOODS's long position.
The idea behind Retail Estates NV and US FOODS HOLDING pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance