Correlation Between Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength Common, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Q2 Holdings with a short position of Interactive Strength. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength.

Diversification Opportunities for Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength

-0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between QTWO and Interactive is -0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength Common in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Interactive Strength and Q2 Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Q2 Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Interactive Strength. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Interactive Strength has no effect on the direction of Q2 Holdings i.e., Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Q2 Holdings is expected to generate 0.18 times more return on investment than Interactive Strength. However, Q2 Holdings is 5.65 times less risky than Interactive Strength. It trades about 0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Interactive Strength Common is currently generating about -0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest  7,366  in Q2 Holdings on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,553  from holding Q2 Holdings or generate 48.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Q2 Holdings  vs.  Interactive Strength Common

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Q2 Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Q2 Holdings are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very abnormal basic indicators, Q2 Holdings displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Interactive Strength 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Interactive Strength Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength

The main advantage of trading using opposite Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Q2 Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Interactive Strength can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Interactive Strength will offset losses from the drop in Interactive Strength's long position.
The idea behind Q2 Holdings and Interactive Strength Common pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world