Correlation Between Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Restaurant Brands International and Transcontinental, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Restaurant Brands with a short position of Transcontinental. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental.

Diversification Opportunities for Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental

0.65

Correlation Coefficient

Restaurant Brands  Transcontinental

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Restaurant and Transcontinental is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Restaurant Brands Internationa and Transcontinental in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Transcontinental and Restaurant Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Restaurant Brands International are associated (or correlated) with Transcontinental. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Transcontinental has no effect on the direction of Restaurant Brands i.e., Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Restaurant Brands is expected to generate 10.21 times less return on investment than Transcontinental. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Restaurant Brands International is 1.87 times less risky than Transcontinental. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Transcontinental is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,009  in Transcontinental on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  791.00  from holding Transcontinental or generate 78.39% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	69.76%
Values	Daily Returns

Restaurant Brands Internationa  vs.  Transcontinental

Restaurant Brands

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Restaurant Brands International are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Transcontinental

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Transcontinental are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Transcontinental may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental

The main advantage of trading using opposite Restaurant Brands and Transcontinental positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, Transcontinental can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Transcontinental will offset losses from the drop in Transcontinental's long position.

The idea behind Restaurant Brands International and Transcontinental pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.