Correlation Between Restaurant Brands and Apple

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Restaurant Brands and Apple at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Restaurant Brands and Apple into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Restaurant Brands International and Apple Inc CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Restaurant Brands and Apple and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Restaurant Brands with a short position of Apple. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Restaurant Brands and Apple.

Diversification Opportunities for Restaurant Brands and Apple

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Restaurant and Apple is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Restaurant Brands Internationa and Apple Inc CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Apple Inc CDR and Restaurant Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Restaurant Brands International are associated (or correlated) with Apple. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Apple Inc CDR has no effect on the direction of Restaurant Brands i.e., Restaurant Brands and Apple go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Restaurant Brands and Apple

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Restaurant Brands is expected to generate 4.71 times less return on investment than Apple. In addition to that, Restaurant Brands is 1.4 times more volatile than Apple Inc CDR. It trades about 0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Apple Inc CDR is currently generating about 0.46 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,256  in Apple Inc CDR on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  299.00  from holding Apple Inc CDR or generate 9.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Restaurant Brands Internationa  vs.  Apple Inc CDR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Restaurant Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Restaurant Brands International are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unsteady basic indicators, Restaurant Brands may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Apple Inc CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Apple Inc CDR are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Apple may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Restaurant Brands and Apple Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands and Apple

The main advantage of trading using opposite Restaurant Brands and Apple positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, Apple can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Apple will offset losses from the drop in Apple's long position.
The idea behind Restaurant Brands International and Apple Inc CDR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets