Correlation Between Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mackenzie Canadian Equity and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mackenzie Canadian with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs

0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mackenzie and Goldman is 0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mackenzie Canadian Equity and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta and Mackenzie Canadian is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mackenzie Canadian Equity are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta has no effect on the direction of Mackenzie Canadian i.e., Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Mackenzie Canadian is expected to generate 2.81 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Mackenzie Canadian is 1.08 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta. It trades about 0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  4,930  in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  200.00  from holding Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta or generate 4.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy96.88%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mackenzie Canadian Equity  vs.  Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mackenzie Canadian Equity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Canadian Equity are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Mackenzie Canadian is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.

Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mackenzie Canadian and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mackenzie Canadian position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Mackenzie Canadian Equity and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum