Correlation Between COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in COMPUTERSHARE with a short position of Performance Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food.

Diversification Opportunities for COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food

0.88

Correlation Coefficient

COMPUTERSHARE  Performance Food

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between COMPUTERSHARE and Performance is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Performance Food and COMPUTERSHARE is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on COMPUTERSHARE are associated (or correlated) with Performance Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Performance Food has no effect on the direction of COMPUTERSHARE i.e., COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon COMPUTERSHARE is expected to generate 1.04 times less return on investment than Performance Food. In addition to that, COMPUTERSHARE is 1.31 times more volatile than Performance Food Group. It trades about 0.18 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Performance Food Group is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  6,800  in Performance Food Group on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,550  from holding Performance Food Group or generate 22.79% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

COMPUTERSHARE  vs.  Performance Food Group

COMPUTERSHARE

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in COMPUTERSHARE are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical indicators, COMPUTERSHARE exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Performance Food

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Performance Food Group are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady basic indicators, Performance Food unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if COMPUTERSHARE position performs unexpectedly, Performance Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Performance Food will offset losses from the drop in Performance Food's long position.

The idea behind COMPUTERSHARE and Performance Food Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.