Correlation Between Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Putnam Pennsylvania Tax and Commodities Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Putnam Pennsylvania with a short position of Commodities Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy.
Diversification Opportunities for Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy
-0.45 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Putnam and Commodities is -0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Putnam Pennsylvania Tax and Commodities Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Commodities Strategy and Putnam Pennsylvania is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Putnam Pennsylvania Tax are associated (or correlated) with Commodities Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Commodities Strategy has no effect on the direction of Putnam Pennsylvania i.e., Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy
Assuming the 90 days horizon Putnam Pennsylvania Tax is expected to under-perform the Commodities Strategy. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Putnam Pennsylvania Tax is 2.96 times less risky than Commodities Strategy. The mutual fund trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Commodities Strategy Fund is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2,969 in Commodities Strategy Fund on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 211.00 from holding Commodities Strategy Fund or generate 7.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Putnam Pennsylvania Tax vs. Commodities Strategy Fund
Performance |
Timeline |
Putnam Pennsylvania Tax |
Commodities Strategy |
Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy
The main advantage of trading using opposite Putnam Pennsylvania and Commodities Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Putnam Pennsylvania position performs unexpectedly, Commodities Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Commodities Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Commodities Strategy's long position.Putnam Pennsylvania vs. Enhanced Fixed Income | Putnam Pennsylvania vs. Alliancebernstein Bond | Putnam Pennsylvania vs. Georgia Tax Free Bond | Putnam Pennsylvania vs. Dreyfusstandish Global Fixed |
Commodities Strategy vs. Basic Materials Fund | Commodities Strategy vs. Energy Services Fund | Commodities Strategy vs. Energy Fund Investor | Commodities Strategy vs. Real Estate Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.
Other Complementary Tools
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities |