Correlation Between United Parks and PSQ Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both United Parks and PSQ Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining United Parks and PSQ Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between United Parks Resorts and PSQ Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on United Parks and PSQ Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in United Parks with a short position of PSQ Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of United Parks and PSQ Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for United Parks and PSQ Holdings

0.35
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between United and PSQ is 0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding United Parks Resorts and PSQ Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PSQ Holdings and United Parks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on United Parks Resorts are associated (or correlated) with PSQ Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PSQ Holdings has no effect on the direction of United Parks i.e., United Parks and PSQ Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between United Parks and PSQ Holdings

Given the investment horizon of 90 days United Parks is expected to generate 1.45 times less return on investment than PSQ Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, United Parks Resorts is 3.5 times less risky than PSQ Holdings. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. PSQ Holdings is currently generating about 0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  410.00  in PSQ Holdings on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (5.00) from holding PSQ Holdings or give up 1.22% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

United Parks Resorts  vs.  PSQ Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
United Parks Resorts 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in United Parks Resorts are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unfluctuating forward-looking signals, United Parks unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
PSQ Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PSQ Holdings are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly uncertain basic indicators, PSQ Holdings demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

United Parks and PSQ Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with United Parks and PSQ Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite United Parks and PSQ Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if United Parks position performs unexpectedly, PSQ Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PSQ Holdings will offset losses from the drop in PSQ Holdings' long position.
The idea behind United Parks Resorts and PSQ Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies