Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Microsoft

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Microsoft at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Microsoft into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Procter Gamble and Microsoft, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Microsoft and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Microsoft. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Microsoft.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Microsoft

-0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Microsoft is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Procter Gamble and Microsoft in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Microsoft and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Microsoft. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Microsoft has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Microsoft go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Microsoft

Assuming the 90 days horizon The Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.92 times more return on investment than Microsoft. However, The Procter Gamble is 1.08 times less risky than Microsoft. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Microsoft is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,090  in The Procter Gamble on December 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (598.00) from holding The Procter Gamble or give up 3.72% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

The Procter Gamble  vs.  Microsoft

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days The Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Microsoft has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in May 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Procter Gamble and Microsoft Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Microsoft

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Microsoft positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Microsoft can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will offset losses from the drop in Microsoft's long position.
The idea behind The Procter Gamble and Microsoft pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges