Correlation Between Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Preferred Securities Fund and Strategic Asset Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Preferred Securities with a short position of Strategic Asset. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset.

Diversification Opportunities for Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset

0.03
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Preferred and Strategic is 0.03. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Preferred Securities Fund and Strategic Asset Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Asset Mana and Preferred Securities is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Preferred Securities Fund are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Asset. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Asset Mana has no effect on the direction of Preferred Securities i.e., Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset

Assuming the 90 days horizon Preferred Securities is expected to generate 7.96 times less return on investment than Strategic Asset. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Preferred Securities Fund is 3.4 times less risky than Strategic Asset. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Strategic Asset Management is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,706  in Strategic Asset Management on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  44.00  from holding Strategic Asset Management or generate 2.58% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Preferred Securities Fund  vs.  Strategic Asset Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Preferred Securities 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Preferred Securities Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Preferred Securities is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Strategic Asset Mana 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Asset Management are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Asset is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset

The main advantage of trading using opposite Preferred Securities and Strategic Asset positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Preferred Securities position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Asset can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Asset will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Asset's long position.
The idea behind Preferred Securities Fund and Strategic Asset Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets