Correlation Between Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Flutter Entertainment PLC and Cogent Communications Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Flutter Entertainment with a short position of Cogent Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications

0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Flutter and Cogent is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Flutter Entertainment PLC and Cogent Communications Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cogent Communications and Flutter Entertainment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Flutter Entertainment PLC are associated (or correlated) with Cogent Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cogent Communications has no effect on the direction of Flutter Entertainment i.e., Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Flutter Entertainment PLC is expected to under-perform the Cogent Communications. In addition to that, Flutter Entertainment is 1.1 times more volatile than Cogent Communications Holdings. It trades about -0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Cogent Communications Holdings is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  7,047  in Cogent Communications Holdings on December 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (797.00) from holding Cogent Communications Holdings or give up 11.31% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Flutter Entertainment PLC  vs.  Cogent Communications Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Flutter Entertainment PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Flutter Entertainment PLC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Cogent Communications Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Flutter Entertainment and Cogent Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Flutter Entertainment position performs unexpectedly, Cogent Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cogent Communications will offset losses from the drop in Cogent Communications' long position.
The idea behind Flutter Entertainment PLC and Cogent Communications Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance