Correlation Between PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands,

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, Common, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Investment with a short position of FitLife Brands,. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands,.

Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands,

-0.29
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and FitLife is -0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, Common in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FitLife Brands, Common and PennantPark Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Investment are associated (or correlated) with FitLife Brands,. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FitLife Brands, Common has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Investment i.e., PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands,

Given the investment horizon of 90 days PennantPark Investment is expected to generate 0.49 times more return on investment than FitLife Brands,. However, PennantPark Investment is 2.02 times less risky than FitLife Brands,. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FitLife Brands, Common is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  669.00  in PennantPark Investment on September 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9.00  from holding PennantPark Investment or generate 1.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

PennantPark Investment  vs.  FitLife Brands, Common

 Performance 
       Timeline  
PennantPark Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PennantPark Investment are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, PennantPark Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands,

The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Investment position performs unexpectedly, FitLife Brands, can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FitLife Brands, will offset losses from the drop in FitLife Brands,'s long position.
The idea behind PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, Common pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal