Correlation Between PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding Companies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Investment with a short position of Comstock Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding.
Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding
0.17 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and Comstock is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding Companies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Comstock Holding Com and PennantPark Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Investment are associated (or correlated) with Comstock Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Comstock Holding Com has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Investment i.e., PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding
Given the investment horizon of 90 days PennantPark Investment is expected to generate 8.88 times less return on investment than Comstock Holding. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, PennantPark Investment is 4.6 times less risky than Comstock Holding. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Comstock Holding Companies is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 768.00 in Comstock Holding Companies on September 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 114.00 from holding Comstock Holding Companies or generate 14.84% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
PennantPark Investment vs. Comstock Holding Companies
Performance |
Timeline |
PennantPark Investment |
Comstock Holding Com |
PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding
The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Investment position performs unexpectedly, Comstock Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Comstock Holding will offset losses from the drop in Comstock Holding's long position.The idea behind PennantPark Investment and Comstock Holding Companies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Comstock Holding vs. St Joe Company | Comstock Holding vs. Stratus Properties | Comstock Holding vs. Mitsui Fudosan Co | Comstock Holding vs. New World Development |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.
Other Complementary Tools
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine |