Correlation Between Payment Financial and Blender Financial

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Payment Financial and Blender Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Payment Financial and Blender Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Payment Financial Technologies and Blender Financial Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Payment Financial and Blender Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Payment Financial with a short position of Blender Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Payment Financial and Blender Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Payment Financial and Blender Financial

-0.21

Correlation Coefficient

Payment Financial  Blender Financial

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Payment and Blender is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Payment Financial Technologies and Blender Financial Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Blender Financial and Payment Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Payment Financial Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Blender Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Blender Financial has no effect on the direction of Payment Financial i.e., Payment Financial and Blender Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Payment Financial and Blender Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Payment Financial Technologies is expected to generate 1.0 times more return on investment than Blender Financial. However, Payment Financial Technologies is 1.0 times less risky than Blender Financial. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Blender Financial Technologies is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  34,434  in Payment Financial Technologies on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,036  from holding Payment Financial Technologies or generate 26.24% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Payment Financial Technologies  vs.  Blender Financial Technologies

Payment Financial

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Payment Financial Technologies are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat uncertain basic indicators, Payment Financial sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Blender Financial

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Blender Financial Technologies are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat uncertain basic indicators, Blender Financial sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Payment Financial and Blender Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Payment Financial and Blender Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Payment Financial position performs unexpectedly, Blender Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Blender Financial will offset losses from the drop in Blender Financial's long position.

The idea behind Payment Financial Technologies and Blender Financial Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.