Correlation Between Philip Morris and Sow Good

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Philip Morris and Sow Good at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Philip Morris and Sow Good into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Philip Morris International and Sow Good Common, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Philip Morris and Sow Good and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Philip Morris with a short position of Sow Good. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Philip Morris and Sow Good.

Diversification Opportunities for Philip Morris and Sow Good

-0.1

Correlation Coefficient

Philip Morris  Sow Good

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Philip and Sow is -0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Philip Morris International and Sow Good Common in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sow Good Common and Philip Morris is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Philip Morris International are associated (or correlated) with Sow Good. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sow Good Common has no effect on the direction of Philip Morris i.e., Philip Morris and Sow Good go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Philip Morris and Sow Good

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Philip Morris International is expected to under-perform the Sow Good. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Philip Morris International is 10.1 times less risky than Sow Good. The stock trades about -0.38 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Sow Good Common is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  299.00  in Sow Good Common on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (21.00) from holding Sow Good Common or give up 7.02% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Philip Morris International  vs.  Sow Good Common

Philip Morris Intern

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Philip Morris International are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, Philip Morris is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Sow Good Common

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Sow Good Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Pair Trading with Philip Morris and Sow Good

The main advantage of trading using opposite Philip Morris and Sow Good positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Philip Morris position performs unexpectedly, Sow Good can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sow Good will offset losses from the drop in Sow Good's long position.

The idea behind Philip Morris International and Sow Good Common pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.