Correlation Between Philip Morris and Dine Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Philip Morris and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Philip Morris and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Philip Morris International and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Philip Morris and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Philip Morris with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Philip Morris and Dine Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Philip Morris and Dine Brands

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Philip and Dine is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Philip Morris International and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and Philip Morris is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Philip Morris International are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of Philip Morris i.e., Philip Morris and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Philip Morris and Dine Brands

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Philip Morris International is expected to generate 0.37 times more return on investment than Dine Brands. However, Philip Morris International is 2.7 times less risky than Dine Brands. It trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dine Brands Global is currently generating about -0.31 per unit of risk. If you would invest  12,543  in Philip Morris International on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (357.00) from holding Philip Morris International or give up 2.85% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Philip Morris International  vs.  Dine Brands Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Philip Morris Intern 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Philip Morris International are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, Philip Morris is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Dine Brands Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unfluctuating performance, the Stock's forward indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Philip Morris and Dine Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Philip Morris and Dine Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Philip Morris and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Philip Morris position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.
The idea behind Philip Morris International and Dine Brands Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities