Correlation Between Planet Green and Sharing Services
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Planet Green and Sharing Services at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Planet Green and Sharing Services into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Planet Green Holdings and Sharing Services Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Planet Green and Sharing Services and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Planet Green with a short position of Sharing Services. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Planet Green and Sharing Services.
Diversification Opportunities for Planet Green and Sharing Services
0.18 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Planet and Sharing is 0.18. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Planet Green Holdings and Sharing Services Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sharing Services Global and Planet Green is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Planet Green Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Sharing Services. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sharing Services Global has no effect on the direction of Planet Green i.e., Planet Green and Sharing Services go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Planet Green and Sharing Services
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Planet Green Holdings is expected to under-perform the Sharing Services. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Planet Green Holdings is 6.02 times less risky than Sharing Services. The stock trades about -0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Sharing Services Global is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 33.00 in Sharing Services Global on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 92.00 from holding Sharing Services Global or generate 278.79% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Planet Green Holdings vs. Sharing Services Global
Performance |
Timeline |
Planet Green Holdings |
Sharing Services Global |
Planet Green and Sharing Services Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Planet Green and Sharing Services
The main advantage of trading using opposite Planet Green and Sharing Services positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Planet Green position performs unexpectedly, Sharing Services can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sharing Services will offset losses from the drop in Sharing Services' long position.The idea behind Planet Green Holdings and Sharing Services Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Sharing Services vs. Seneca Foods Corp | Sharing Services vs. Bridgford Foods | Sharing Services vs. J J Snack | Sharing Services vs. Central Garden Pet |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences |