Correlation Between Park Hotels and Medical Properties

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Park Hotels and Medical Properties at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Park Hotels and Medical Properties into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Park Hotels Resorts and Medical Properties Trust, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Park Hotels and Medical Properties and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Park Hotels with a short position of Medical Properties. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Park Hotels and Medical Properties.

Diversification Opportunities for Park Hotels and Medical Properties

-0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Park and Medical is -0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Park Hotels Resorts and Medical Properties Trust in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Medical Properties Trust and Park Hotels is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Park Hotels Resorts are associated (or correlated) with Medical Properties. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Medical Properties Trust has no effect on the direction of Park Hotels i.e., Park Hotels and Medical Properties go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Park Hotels and Medical Properties

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Park Hotels Resorts is expected to generate 0.55 times more return on investment than Medical Properties. However, Park Hotels Resorts is 1.83 times less risky than Medical Properties. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Medical Properties Trust is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,448  in Park Hotels Resorts on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  44.00  from holding Park Hotels Resorts or generate 3.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Park Hotels Resorts  vs.  Medical Properties Trust

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Park Hotels Resorts 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Park Hotels Resorts are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite inconsistent forward-looking signals, Park Hotels may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Medical Properties Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Medical Properties Trust has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.

Park Hotels and Medical Properties Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Park Hotels and Medical Properties

The main advantage of trading using opposite Park Hotels and Medical Properties positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Park Hotels position performs unexpectedly, Medical Properties can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Medical Properties will offset losses from the drop in Medical Properties' long position.
The idea behind Park Hotels Resorts and Medical Properties Trust pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance