Correlation Between Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Pine Cliff Energy and POSCO Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Pine Cliff with a short position of POSCO Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings

-0.07
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Pine and POSCO is -0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Pine Cliff Energy and POSCO Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on POSCO Holdings and Pine Cliff is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Pine Cliff Energy are associated (or correlated) with POSCO Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of POSCO Holdings has no effect on the direction of Pine Cliff i.e., Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings

Assuming the 90 days horizon Pine Cliff Energy is expected to under-perform the POSCO Holdings. But the pink sheet apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Pine Cliff Energy is 1.16 times less risky than POSCO Holdings. The pink sheet trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The POSCO Holdings is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,722  in POSCO Holdings on December 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,240) from holding POSCO Holdings or give up 21.67% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Pine Cliff Energy  vs.  POSCO Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Pine Cliff Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Pine Cliff Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
POSCO Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days POSCO Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking signals, POSCO Holdings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Pine Cliff and POSCO Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Pine Cliff position performs unexpectedly, POSCO Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in POSCO Holdings will offset losses from the drop in POSCO Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Pine Cliff Energy and POSCO Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.