Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble Health and Hybrid Financial Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Hybrid Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial

-0.3

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Hybrid Financial

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Hybrid is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble Health and Hybrid Financial Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hybrid Financial Services and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble Health are associated (or correlated) with Hybrid Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hybrid Financial Services has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Procter Gamble Health is expected to generate 0.67 times more return on investment than Hybrid Financial. However, Procter Gamble Health is 1.5 times less risky than Hybrid Financial. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hybrid Financial Services is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  520,793  in Procter Gamble Health on December 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  10,387  from holding Procter Gamble Health or generate 1.99% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble Health  vs.  Hybrid Financial Services

Procter Gamble Health

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble Health are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Hybrid Financial Services

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Hybrid Financial Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Hybrid Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Hybrid Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hybrid Financial will offset losses from the drop in Hybrid Financial's long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble Health and Hybrid Financial Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.