Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Newell Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Newell Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Newell Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Procter Gamble and Newell Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Newell Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Newell Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Newell Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Newell Brands

0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Newell is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Procter Gamble and Newell Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Newell Brands and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Newell Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Newell Brands has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Newell Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Newell Brands

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 2.34 times less return on investment than Newell Brands. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, The Procter Gamble is 1.86 times less risky than Newell Brands. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Newell Brands is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,019  in Newell Brands on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,086  from holding Newell Brands or generate 21.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy97.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

The Procter Gamble  vs.  Newell Brands

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in The Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Newell Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Newell Brands are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Newell Brands sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and Newell Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Newell Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Newell Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Newell Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Newell Brands will offset losses from the drop in Newell Brands' long position.
The idea behind The Procter Gamble and Newell Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets