Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Colgate Palmolive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive

0.82

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Colgate Palmolive

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Colgate is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Colgate Palmolive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Colgate Palmolive has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon The Procter Gamble is expected to under-perform the Colgate Palmolive. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, The Procter Gamble is 1.56 times less risky than Colgate Palmolive. The stock trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Colgate Palmolive is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7,964  in Colgate Palmolive on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (340.00) from holding Colgate Palmolive or give up 4.27% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

The Procter Gamble  vs.  Colgate Palmolive

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days The Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Colgate Palmolive

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Colgate Palmolive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong essential indicators, Colgate Palmolive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Colgate Palmolive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Colgate Palmolive will offset losses from the drop in Colgate Palmolive's long position.

The idea behind The Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.