Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Bank of New York

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Bank of New York at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Bank of New York into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Bank of New, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Bank of New York and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Bank of New York. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Bank of New York.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Bank of New York

0.53

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Bank of New York

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Bank is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Bank of New in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of New York and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Bank of New York. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of New York has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Bank of New York go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Bank of New York

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.59 times more return on investment than Bank of New York. However, Procter Gamble is 1.7 times less risky than Bank of New York. It trades about -0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of New is currently generating about -0.23 per unit of risk. If you would invest  17,079  in Procter Gamble on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (566.00) from holding Procter Gamble or give up 3.31% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Bank of New

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Bank of New York

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of New are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent forward-looking signals, Bank of New York is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Bank of New York

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Bank of New York positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Bank of New York can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of New York will offset losses from the drop in Bank of New York's long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble and Bank of New pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.