Correlation Between PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Floating Rate and Consilium Acquisition I, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Floating with a short position of Consilium Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition.
Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition
0.1 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and Consilium is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Floating Rate and Consilium Acquisition I in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Consilium Acquisition and PennantPark Floating is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Floating Rate are associated (or correlated) with Consilium Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Consilium Acquisition has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Floating i.e., PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition
Given the investment horizon of 90 days PennantPark Floating is expected to generate 15.2 times less return on investment than Consilium Acquisition. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, PennantPark Floating Rate is 1.54 times less risky than Consilium Acquisition. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Consilium Acquisition I is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1,169 in Consilium Acquisition I on October 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 108.00 from holding Consilium Acquisition I or generate 9.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
PennantPark Floating Rate vs. Consilium Acquisition I
Performance |
Timeline |
PennantPark Floating Rate |
Consilium Acquisition |
PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition
The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Floating and Consilium Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Floating position performs unexpectedly, Consilium Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Consilium Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Consilium Acquisition's long position.PennantPark Floating vs. Gladstone Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Horizon Technology Finance | PennantPark Floating vs. Stellus Capital Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Prospect Capital |
Consilium Acquisition vs. Semtech | Consilium Acquisition vs. Micron Technology | Consilium Acquisition vs. Analog Devices | Consilium Acquisition vs. ASML Holding NV |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios |