Correlation Between Penn National and KINDER

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Penn National and KINDER at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Penn National and KINDER into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and KINDER.

Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and KINDER

0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Penn and KINDER is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Penn National and KINDER

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn National Gaming is expected to under-perform the KINDER. In addition to that, Penn National is 2.92 times more volatile than KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  8,851  in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (49.00) from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or give up 0.55% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy75.61%
ValuesDaily Returns

Penn National Gaming  vs.  KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Penn National Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Penn National is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Penn National and KINDER Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Penn National and KINDER

The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.
The idea behind Penn National Gaming and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments