Correlation Between Penn National and KINDER

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Penn National and KINDER at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Penn National and KINDER into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and KINDER.

Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and KINDER

0.31

Correlation Coefficient

Penn National  KINDER

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Penn and KINDER is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Penn National and KINDER

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn National Gaming is expected to generate 4.11 times more return on investment than KINDER. However, Penn National is 4.11 times more volatile than KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,888  in Penn National Gaming on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  114.00  from holding Penn National Gaming or generate 6.04% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	80.33%
Values	Daily Returns

Penn National Gaming  vs.  KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

Penn National Gaming

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile basic indicators, Penn National may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Penn National and KINDER

The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.

The idea behind Penn National Gaming and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.